Please enjoy my new free sample of Welfare argumentative essay!
Should People on Welfare be Forced to Work?
It may be a bit cliché, but pardon me for a moment to hearken back to an old proverb that goes something like this: “Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach him how to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.” If you are having trouble understanding the meaning of that proverb, please allow me a moment while I try to explain.
Welfare in the United States was initiated to help those who could not help themselves. Today it has expanded its scope to the point where generations of individuals depend solely on the income received from Welfare. This was never the original intention of this generous program, and today it is simply giving people enough to support life, with nothing but Welfare checks to look forward to in the future.
By forcing able-bodied individuals to work, at least part-time, as a requirement for collecting payments from this program, they will in effect be learning how to fish for themselves. The result of this type of program is sure to increase the individual’s self-esteem. At the same time it will take some of the burden of supporting strangers off taxpayers who are already providing something of value to millions who are contributing nothing to the same system that supports them.
Charity is good, but charity that eliminates personal responsibility can only do harm to the whole of society. When people are not taught that they must contribute to their own well-being, self-respect diminishes and respect for others follows suit. When the burden of supporting the masses falls on a few, motivation to succeed becomes victim to the unfairness of it all.
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, but if you teach him how to fish for himself he will eat for a lifetime, and he will help uplift society with the pride he feels in what he is capable of achieving.
Should people on Welfare who are able-bodied be forced to work? Certainly!
If you would like me to write your homework essay – order here a unique custom paper written just for you!
Fill in the form with your requirements and the system will give you a quote for your order.
Show MoreThere is an ongoing debate over whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. Both sides of the argument have merit. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against those from low socioeconomic demographics, implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts. However, those who support the law note that its intended purpose is to ensure that taxpayer money is not being squandered on people who only plan to abuse this assistance. Only nine states so far have instituted drug testing of candidates for welfare assistance. This drug testing has proven to be…show more content…
In addition to the requirement for employment as a condition for a continuance of benefits, “states have proposed drug testing of applicants and recipients of public welfare benefits since federal welfare reform in 1996” (Finzel, 2014). While some states test recipients based upon suspicion of drug use, others choose to test all applicants.
In 1999, Michigan was the first state to implement a suspicionless drug testing policy as a condition for receiving welfare benefits. A district court struck down the policy on the Fourth Amendment grounds, and the Sixth Circuit court ultimately divided, upholding the district court’s injunction and putting a temporary stop to the policy. However, the constitutional issues remain undecided. (Goetzl, 2013, p. 1539)
Currently, politicians from twenty-four states have proposed legislation to institute drug testing as a condition for welfare determination, but only nine have formally approved it. Those states are: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Utah (Finzel, 2014).
Supporters of this and similar legislation have proposed that applicants for welfare pay for the drug testing themselves. If test results are negative for drug use, the welfare applicant is fully reimbursed. The cost for drug testing varies, generally ranging from $30 to $40. Proponents of drug testing further propose that making the applicants pay for their